LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: Which SARM Is Right for You?

  • By: Dave Moffat
  • Date: October 12, 2022

When it comes to choosing a SARM, there are a lot of options out there. But two of the most popular SARMs on the market are LGD 4033 and Rad 140. So, which one is right for you?

In this blog post, we’ll compare LGD 4033 vs Rad 140, looking at their similarities and differences.

We’ll also discuss the pros and cons of each SARM, as well as their effectiveness, side effects, dosage recommendations, and stacking options.

By the end, you should have a better idea of which SARM is right for you. Let’s get started!

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: The Similarities

Both LGD 4033 and Rad 140 are popular SARMs with a lot to offer. Here are some of the similarities between these two SARMs:

  • Both LGD 4033 and Rad 140 are orally bioavailable, meaning they can be taken in pill form.
  • Are both non-steroidal SARMs, so they don’t come with the same side effects as steroids.
  • They are both known for their ability to build muscle mass and increase strength.
  • Both frequently used by bodybuilders and other athletes.
  • They are both currently being studied for their potential therapeutic benefits.

As you can see, there is a lot to like about both LGD 4033 and Rad 140. But what about the differences between these two SARMs? Let’s take a look.

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: The Differences

While LGD 4033 and Rad 140 have a lot in common, there are also some key differences between these two SARMs. Here are the most important ones to know about:

  • Rad 140 is more potent than LGD 4033. This means that it can build muscle mass and increase strength at a faster rate.
  • LGD 4033 has a longer half-life than Rad 140. This means that it stays in your system for longer and requires less frequent dosing.
  • Rad 140 is known for its ability to increase endurance, while LGD 4033 is not.
  • Rad 140 is being studied as a potential treatment for breast cancer, while LGD 4033 is not.

So, which SARM is right for you? Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each one to find out.

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: The Pros and Cons

Now that you know the key similarities and differences between LGD 4033 and Rad 140, let’s take a look at the pros and cons of each SARM.

LGD 4033 Pros:

1. LGD 4033 is an orally bioavailable SARM, so it’s easy to take.

2. LGD 4033 has a longer half-life than Rad 140, so it requires less frequent dosing.

3. LGD 4033 is known for its ability to build muscle mass and increase strength.

4. LGD 4033 is being studied for its potential therapeutic benefits.

5. LGD 4033 is a non-steroidal SARM, so it doesn’t come with the same side effects as steroids.

LGD 4033 Cons:

1. LGD 4033 is less potent than Rad 140, so it takes longer to build muscle mass and increase strength.

2. LGD 4033 is not known for its ability to increase endurance.

3. LGD 4033 is not being studied as a potential treatment for breast cancer.

Rad 140 Pros:

1. Rad 140 is more potent than LGD 4033, so it can build muscle mass and increase strength at a faster rate.

2. Rad 140 is known for its ability to increase endurance.

3. Rad 140 is being studied as a potential treatment for breast cancer.

4. Rad 140 is a non-steroidal SARM, so it doesn’t come with the same side effects as steroids.

Rad 140 Cons:

1. Rad 140 is not orally bioavailable, so it’s more difficult to take.

2. Rad 140 has a shorter half-life than LGD 4033, so it requires more frequent dosing.

3. Rad 140 is not known for its ability to build muscle mass (although it can increase strength).

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: Which One Is More Effective?

Both LGD 4033 and Rad 140 are effective SARMs with a lot of potential benefits. But as we’ve seen, Rad 140 is more powerful than LGD 4033. It has been shown to build more muscle mass and increase strength to a greater extent.

Rad 140 is also a newer SARM, so there is less research on it compared to LGD 4033. This means that there is still more unknown about Rad 140. However, the initial research looks promising and suggests that Rad 140 is a very effective SARM.

LGD 4033 is also an effective SARM, but it is not as powerful as Rad 140. It has been shown to build muscle mass and increase strength, but at a slower rate. LGD 4033 is a more well-researched SARM, so there is less unknown about it. But overall, Rad 140 appears to be the more effective SARM.

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: Side Effects Comparison

The most notable side effect associated with LGD 4033 is suppression of natural testosterone production. This can lead to a range of symptoms, including low libido, erectile dysfunction, decreased sperm count, and even infertility.

Users may experience a range of negative psychological effects such as mood swings and irritability.

Rad 140 is also thought to suppress natural testosterone levels to some extent, although it does seem to be less potent than LGD 4033 in this regard.

Other possible side effects include acne, hair loss or growth in unusual places on the body like the face or back. Both compounds can also cause bloating and water retention in some users.

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: Dosage Recommendations

The recommended dosage of LGD 4033 is between 10 and 20 mg per day. The recommended dosage of Rad 140 is between 20 and 30 mg per day.

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: Stacking Options

LGD 4033 can be stacked with other SARMs such as Rad 140, Ostarine, and Andarine. Rad 140 can also be stacked with other SARMs such as LGD 4033, Ostarine, and Andarine.

The combination of LGD 4033 and Rad 140 is a particularly popular stack for those looking to build muscle mass and increase strength. This stack is often referred to as the “bulking stack.

LGD 4033 vs Rad 140: Final Thoughts

LGD 4033 and Rad 140 are both effective SARMs with a lot of potential benefits. Rad 140 is more powerful than LGD 4033, but it is also a newer SARM with less research. LGD 4033 is a more well-researched SARM, but it is not as powerful as Rad 140.

Both SARMs can cause suppression of natural testosterone levels, which can lead to a range of side effects. The recommended dosage of LGD 4033 is between 10 and 20 mg per day, while the recommended dosage of Rad 140 is between 20 and 30 mg per day.

LGD 4033 and Rad 140 can be stacked together or with other SARMs for even more potential benefits. The combination of LGD 4033 and Rad 140 is a particularly popular stack for those looking to bulk up.

Overall, Rad 140 appears to be the more effective SARM, but LGD 4033 is also an effective option with less side effects. It’s ultimately up to you to decide which SARM is right for you.

+ posts

Hi, I'm Dave Moffat the founder and Chief Editor of steroidsourcetalk.com. My passion has always been bodybuilding but with 15 years' experience in weight loss programs too, it's hard not to mention all that when you're working at your fitness level fullest (I hope). When Im not in the gym or spending time away from my family i often think about what advice would help others achieve theirs goals just like these inspired mine.

Leave a Reply